Trusts

Similar to transferring a home, cabin, or other piece of real property into a revocable trust, individuals who have inherited or purchased farmland in Minnesota may want to transfer their farmland into a revocable trust.  The reasons vary depending upon the situation, however, the major reason for transferring farmland into a trust is for estate planning purposes.

As discussed in previous posts, revocable trust have numerous benefits.  Such benefits include avoiding the probate process, planning for incapacity, and managing the transfer of assets.  But Minnesotans who own farmland and want to transfer the land into a trust should be aware of the Minnesota Corporate Farm Act (Mn Stat. 500.24).  The reason: A trust that owns farmland in Minnesota is must register with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture by completing the Minnesota Corporate Farm Application.  More importantly, violation of the statute can result in a $500.00 fine and a gross misdemeanor.

A little history.

The purpose of the Minnesota Corporate Farm Act is, “to encourage and protect the family farm as a basic economic unit, to insure it as the most socially desirable mode of agricultural production, and to enhance and promote the stability and well-being of rural society in Minnesota and the nuclear family.”  Although transferring property into a trust may not be contrary to the purpose of the statute, trustees should carefully review the statute to ensure that they are in compliance.

Trusts can be exempt (sort of)

There are exceptions and exemptions available for certain types of entities.  One such exemption is the de minimis exemption.  The statute provides the de minimis exemption

“any corporation, pension or investment fund, limited liability company, or limited partnership that directly or indirectly owns, acquires, or otherwise obtains any interest in 40 acres or less of agricultural land and annually receives less than $150 per acre in gross revenue from rental or agricultural production.”

Notice that the statute does NOT include the trust as an entity eligible for the de minimis exemption.  That being said, the Department of Agriculture has a history of allowing trusts to use this exemption.  The list of Commissioner’s Exemptions indicates that farmland that has been transferred into a trust for estate planning purposes may qualify as exempt.  Even if the Commissioner grants this exemption, the trustees must still file an annual report.  If you own farmland in Minnesota, or if you think that the Corporate Farm Act may apply to you, seek advice from your real property or estate planning attorney.

This article is for informational purposes only and should not be used as legal advice. 

Photo: http://mn2020hindsight.org/view/land-values-moderate-reflect-market-sense

Resources:

  • Mn Stat 500.24 – https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=500.24
  • Minnesota House of Representatives website – http://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/pubs/ss/sscorpfarm.htm
  • Minnesota Department of Agriculture Corporate Farm Report – http://www.mda.state.mn.us/licensing/licensetypes/corpfarmreport.aspx

Trusts and Minnesota Farmland is a post from: Epilawg

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Trusts and Incapacity

by Maggie Green on July 29, 2011

Revocable trusts have many benefits.  They typically allow for a smooth transition of assets when an individual dies, they can avoid the probate process, and they may incorporate transfer tax planning techniques such as disclaimers, QTIP trusts, and GST provisions (to name a few).  While these benefits are great, the unsung heroes of the revocable trust just might be the incapacity provisions.  These provisions are guidelines and standards for what to do when the settlor is incapacitated.

The increasing rates of dementia and Alzheimer disease coupled with the fact that people are living longer presents issues with regard to elderly individuals’ financial independence.  In many instances, elderly individuals are searching for a way to delegate the management of their finances yet still maintain ownership of their assets.  Revocable trusts are an excellent means to achieving such delegation.  The settlor may act as trustee and manage their assets for as long as they are able, and if he or she is deemed incapacitated, a successor trustee will step in to assist.

Trust vs. Joint Tenancy

It is common for elderly individuals to name an adult child as joint bank account holder.  However, as explained in a recent New Old Age article, joint tenancy is not ideal for a multitude of reasons.  At the top of the list is this: the creditors of a joint tenant can make claims against and seek payment from all of the assets in the jointly held account.  A revocable trust is far superior at avoiding this issue because assets transferred into a trust are not available to creditors of the elderly parent’s adult child.  [NOTE: This does not apply to fraudulent transfers for the purpose of avoiding creditor claims, assets that are subject to a personal guarantee made by the settlor trustee, or assets pledge under any other contractual obligation].

Trust vs. Convenience Account

An alternative to joint tenancy, the “convenience account without rights of survivorship” as described in the New Old Age article, is better than creating an account in joint tenancy.  With a convenience account, the assets are owned solely by the elderly individual, but another person is named to make deposits and transfers.  Although they are convenient, revocable trusts have a leg up on the convenience account.  The reason: they allow an individual to plan for a multitude of scenarios.

For example, the revocable trust document may outline who will become successor trustee and under what conditions that individual can name additional trustees, co-trustees, or corporate trustees.  In addition, the trust document defines incapacity, so an individual can predetermine the conditions for which he or she may be deemed unable to act as trustee.  The trust will name beneficiaries so that there is no confusion over who owns an asset.  And last but not least, the successor trustees have a fiduciary duty of loyalty to the settlor and any other beneficiaries of the trust.

Conclusion

Thoughtfully preparing for incapacity with a revocable trust can avoid family conflict by clearly naming and instructing the trustees.  It can also reduce the opportunity for impropriety on the part of whomever is assisting the elderly individual with their finances.  Although a revocable trust is not appropriate for everyone, it should be considered by individuals concerned with incapacity and the issues surrounding the delegation of financial responsibilities.

As always, confer with your estate planning attorney, tax advisor, and financial planner to determine the best planning tools for you.

Trusts and Incapacity is a post from: Epilawg

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Raising Young Philanthropists

July 8, 2011

One consistent goal of estate planning clients who have children is to ensure financial stability for their children in the event that both parents die. These same parents often recognize that their children may not be mature enough to manage assets in a responsible way. To address this issue, trusts are created to ensure that [...]

Raising Young Philanthropists is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Dynasty Trusts

May 28, 2011

A Dynasty Trust is one that may continue in existence indefinitely.  In most states, a Trust can only exist for a certain period of time. Many times this restriction is called the “Rule Against Perpetuities” which requires that a trust must terminate no later than 21 years after the death of the last life in [...]

Dynasty Trusts is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Deeds & Probate

April 19, 2011

In past articles we have covered the pros and cons of avoiding probate.  As a brief refresher, probate is not always a terrible process but in some cases, it can be long, complicated, and expensive. If you want to avoid probate, you need to title your property in a way that it will be transferred [...]

Deeds & Probate is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Trustee Duties Part 3: Independence and Impartiality

January 21, 2011

The duty of independence requires that the trustee remain independent from and impartial to the various beneficiaries. Bogert’s Trusts and Trustees explains, “A trustee who holds for successive beneficiaries owes a duty to them to administer the trust with impartial consideration for the interests of all the beneficiaries. He [or she] should not unnecessarily show [...]

Trustee Duties Part 3: Independence and Impartiality is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Trustee Duties Part 2: Follow the Trust Instrument

January 2, 2011

The duty to follow the written trust instrument is fundamental to a successful trusteeship. This duty requires a trustee to, “carry out the directions of the testator or the settlor as expressed in the terms of the trust.”[1] If a trustee’s actions are questioned, a court will look to the trust instrument when assessing whether a trustee [...]

Trustee Duties Part 2: Follow the Trust Instrument is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Trustee Duties Part 1: Loyalty and Care

December 5, 2010

Trustees are given certain responsibilities and duties when administering a trust.  These responsibilities can vary depending upon the trust instrument or document, but there are a few duties that apply broadly to all trustees.  This article will cover the two main duties, those of Loyalty and Care, that all trustees must understand before accepting the [...]

Trustee Duties Part 1: Loyalty and Care is a post from: Epilawg

Read the full article →

Asset Protection Trusts: a general overview

June 27, 2010

A few individuals have recently asked me about freezing or protecting their assets from the claims of creditors.  To put this idea into context, you may remember a debate last fall about whether Tiger Woods should be able to use a self-settled asset protection trust to “shield” assets in the event of a divorce (More [...]

Read the full article →

Attention All Parents: You Need a Will!

May 13, 2010

Having a Will drawn up is not a top priority for many people, particularly parents who are focused on raising their children. In addition to being extremely busy, talking about incapacity or death is discomforting and often times the conversation is easily dismissed or delayed. But here are a few reasons why it is imperative [...]

Read the full article →